After Roger Ver posted a video of a Hong Kong merchandising machine accepting Bitcoin Money (BCH) and never Bitcoin (BTC), dealer and YouTuber Tone Vays claimed Ver paid for the merchandising machine to keep away from accepting BTC. Ver denied such claims.
Ver demoed a Honk Kong merchandising machine accepting BCH
Ver, an outspoken proponent of BCH, posted a Might 29 video on Twitter of a Hong Kong merchandising machine accepting BCH, Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Binance Coin (BNB) — however not BTC. “There is no Bitcoin accepted in any respect,” Ver mentioned within the video, noting the coin’s excessive charges and community site visitors.
The matters of charges and community velocity have been a sticking level lately among the many crypto neighborhood, as varied options such because the Lightning Network, look to assist BTC scale.
Tone Vays pipes up saying Ver paid for the merchandising unit
Well-liked dealer and crypto YouTuber, Tone Vays, responded to Ver’s video, accusing the BCH proponent of paying for the merchandising machine’s internet hosting of BCH as an alternative of BTC.
“Actual query is what number of transactions have they processed since that demo and what are they doing with the BCH and ETH,” Vays mentioned. He posited the machine probably hosted no different BCH transactions. If it did, Vays claimed the unit most likely robotically offered such BCH into money.
Dealer Willy Woo additionally chimed in after Vays, including:
“This was my first thought additionally, it’s normal apply for decrease tier altcoins to pay to get entry to ATMs, which begs the query of how centralized these initiatives are.”
Over time, Ver has debated Vays at various factors. Ver generally takes the stance that BTC shouldn’t be sufficient like digital money.
Roger Ver instructed Cointelegraph on Might 30:
“I’ve invested in a whole lot of issues, however to the most effective of my data, I am not an investor in any method for these merchandising machines, and I do not even know the folks behind it,”
Ver added:
“I think the actual purpose they do not settle for BTC is as a result of BTC charges are too excessive, and the funds are too simple to reverse.”
